Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Function"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→More/Longer examples: new section
imported>DewiMorgan m (→Templates considered harmful: Damn fine rebuttal!) |
imported>Qazaaq (→More/Longer examples: new section) |
||
| Line 162: | Line 162: | ||
::I vote "shortname" gets changed to "alias" - it usually ''is'' just a shorter name, but at least I seem to recall cases where it was used as a true alias. To be sure, Bethesda's [[GetSelf]]/[[This]] are true aliases. | ::I vote "shortname" gets changed to "alias" - it usually ''is'' just a shorter name, but at least I seem to recall cases where it was used as a true alias. To be sure, Bethesda's [[GetSelf]]/[[This]] are true aliases. | ||
::[[User:DragoonWraith|DragoonWraith]] · [[User talk:DragoonWraith|talk]] · 20:24, 5 February 2009 (UTC) | ::[[User:DragoonWraith|DragoonWraith]] · [[User talk:DragoonWraith|talk]] · 20:24, 5 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
== More/Longer examples == | |||
I noticed [[User:Maran|Maran]] placed a rather long example on the [[IsInInterior]] page, which [[User:Cipscis|Cipscis]] later removed. I don't know if the example was wrong or not, but it got me thinking. Just now another individual commented on the lack of semantic examples on the function pages on the [http://cs.elderscrolls.com/constwiki/index.php/Community_Portal#Need_working_examples: CS Wiki Community Portal]. | |||
As of now we've mostly/only provided syntactic examples. I think adding semantic examples are a good idea. | |||
Assuming no one is against that; where are we going to put them on the function pages? A semantic example is easily twice the size of a syntactic example, and usually one isn't enough. So maybe a subpage is in order. Maybe we could add a <nowiki>[more]</nowiki> link on the examples header, like the syntax help link? (I'm quite pleased with how that turned out) | |||
<br/>--[[User:Qazaaq|Qazaaq]] 21:28, 25 April 2009 (UTC) | |||