Difference between revisions of "Talk:Unofficial Tutorials"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Ok...: there's also Links
imported>DragoonWraith (New page: == Ok... == Great idea. But also, this is blatant advertisement. I haven't read the tutorials, I don't know if they're any good, but this page needs to be more thorough. One of the '''big...) |
imported>Qazaaq |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Great idea. But also, this is blatant advertisement. I haven't read the tutorials, I don't know if they're any good, but this page needs to be more thorough. One of the '''biggest''' weaknesses of the CS Wiki is a failure to properly link to off-site tutorials. We're terrible at it. The GECK Wiki would be much improved if it did this better. This is a... well, it's a start, even if it is ridiculously one-sided. Could someone flesh this out, get some Nexus and such links in here?<br /> | Great idea. But also, this is blatant advertisement. I haven't read the tutorials, I don't know if they're any good, but this page needs to be more thorough. One of the '''biggest''' weaknesses of the CS Wiki is a failure to properly link to off-site tutorials. We're terrible at it. The GECK Wiki would be much improved if it did this better. This is a... well, it's a start, even if it is ridiculously one-sided. Could someone flesh this out, get some Nexus and such links in here?<br /> | ||
[[User:DragoonWraith|DragoonWraith]] · [[User talk:DragoonWraith|talk]] · 04:05, 2 June 2009 (UTC) | [[User:DragoonWraith|DragoonWraith]] · [[User talk:DragoonWraith|talk]] · 04:05, 2 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
:We've also got [[Links|this]]. Not sure which is the best approach. | |||
:--[[User:Qazaaq|Qazaaq]] 20:11, 2 June 2009 (UTC) | |||