Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Function"

Template talk:Function (edit)

425 bytes added , 02:21, 21 April 2009

m

→‎Templates considered harmful: forgot to sign; adding another reason

Anonymous user

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 * And they have been known to kill puppies and kittens.
 * Even ''proposed'' templating discourages editing. I'm certainly not going to bother editing any more function pages before I've got to grips with the template, because it's just a royal waste of time if they're only going to need rewriting. And I can't imagine many people feeling differently.
+* Sometimes I go to other pages to find out the markup for something. If, instead of the markup I'm lookingfor, I find some line noise on the first three pages I try, that's just a downer, and I might decide to do the thing I was trying to do in a less goodlooking way rather than remember how to do that thing in wiki markup. It's happened once here for me already.
-Well, just a thought, and opinion. If templates are here to stay, then I'll accept it, learn the language, and use them. But I've got a million other things to do, it's low on my priority list, so I may never get round to it. And the function pages are off my list of possible ways to procrastinate until then.
+Well, just a thought, and opinion. If templates are here to stay, then I'll accept it, learn the language, and use them. But I've got a million other things to do, it's low on my priority list, so I may never get round to it. And the function pages are off my list of possible ways to procrastinate until then. [[User:DewiMorgan|DewiMorgan]] 07:21, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 ==Testing==