Difference between revisions of "Talk:Links"
Mod utilities are nice, though
imported>DragoonWraith (New page: == "Regulating" == We need someone to police these links. On the one hand, it's valuable to have some links available. However, I '''do not''' want to turn this into free advertising for ...) |
imported>Haama (Mod utilities are nice, though) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Actually, mod hosts really don't seem appropriate here ''anyway''. There should be a stickied list in the forums, as their was for Oblivion, and we can link to that. What we should have are links to other sites with tutorials. One of the CSwiki's biggest problems (IMO) is the lack of appropriate linking to other resources available.<br /> | Actually, mod hosts really don't seem appropriate here ''anyway''. There should be a stickied list in the forums, as their was for Oblivion, and we can link to that. What we should have are links to other sites with tutorials. One of the CSwiki's biggest problems (IMO) is the lack of appropriate linking to other resources available.<br /> | ||
[[User:DragoonWraith|DragoonWraith]] · [[User talk:DragoonWraith|talk]] · 17:38, 27 December 2008 (UTC) | [[User:DragoonWraith|DragoonWraith]] · [[User talk:DragoonWraith|talk]] · 17:38, 27 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
:Putting the page through Google's translator, a Geck tutorial was added on 12-27. Otherwise, it seems like a small mod host. | |||
:In a more general sense, TESNexus (and possibly PES) should stay up because it offers mod ''utilities'' (as well as tutorials). We might want to point to those categories specifically, but they are useful for mod making. | |||
:--[[User:Haama|Haama]] 06:52, 28 December 2008 (UTC) | |||