Difference between revisions of "Talk:Unofficial Tutorials"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>DragoonWraith (New page: == Ok... == Great idea. But also, this is blatant advertisement. I haven't read the tutorials, I don't know if they're any good, but this page needs to be more thorough. One of the '''big...) |
imported>Qazaaq (→Merge: thanks!) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Great idea. But also, this is blatant advertisement. I haven't read the tutorials, I don't know if they're any good, but this page needs to be more thorough. One of the '''biggest''' weaknesses of the CS Wiki is a failure to properly link to off-site tutorials. We're terrible at it. The GECK Wiki would be much improved if it did this better. This is a... well, it's a start, even if it is ridiculously one-sided. Could someone flesh this out, get some Nexus and such links in here?<br /> | Great idea. But also, this is blatant advertisement. I haven't read the tutorials, I don't know if they're any good, but this page needs to be more thorough. One of the '''biggest''' weaknesses of the CS Wiki is a failure to properly link to off-site tutorials. We're terrible at it. The GECK Wiki would be much improved if it did this better. This is a... well, it's a start, even if it is ridiculously one-sided. Could someone flesh this out, get some Nexus and such links in here?<br /> | ||
[[User:DragoonWraith|DragoonWraith]] · [[User talk:DragoonWraith|talk]] · 04:05, 2 June 2009 (UTC) | [[User:DragoonWraith|DragoonWraith]] · [[User talk:DragoonWraith|talk]] · 04:05, 2 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
:We've also got [[Links|this]]. Not sure which is the best approach. | |||
:--[[User:Qazaaq|Qazaaq]] 20:11, 2 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
==Merge== | |||
I've suggested a merge with the [[Links]] page. If no one objects I'll merge the two before the end next week. (Feel free to do the same if I haven't by then.) | |||
<br/>--[[User:Qazaaq|Qazaaq]] 21:44, 28 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Looks like you forgot to do this. It might have been a bit longer than two weeks, but better late than never - I just merged the content on this page with [[Links]]<br />-- [[User:Cipscis|Cipscis]] 01:53, 21 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
::Seems like I did. Thanks for handling it! | |||
::--[[User:Qazaaq|Qazaaq]] 22:17, 21 January 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 17:17, 21 January 2010
Ok...[edit source]
Great idea. But also, this is blatant advertisement. I haven't read the tutorials, I don't know if they're any good, but this page needs to be more thorough. One of the biggest weaknesses of the CS Wiki is a failure to properly link to off-site tutorials. We're terrible at it. The GECK Wiki would be much improved if it did this better. This is a... well, it's a start, even if it is ridiculously one-sided. Could someone flesh this out, get some Nexus and such links in here?
DragoonWraith · talk · 04:05, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Merge[edit source]
I've suggested a merge with the Links page. If no one objects I'll merge the two before the end next week. (Feel free to do the same if I haven't by then.)
--Qazaaq 21:44, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- Looks like you forgot to do this. It might have been a bit longer than two weeks, but better late than never - I just merged the content on this page with Links
-- Cipscis 01:53, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- Seems like I did. Thanks for handling it!
- --Qazaaq 22:17, 21 January 2010 (UTC)