Difference between revisions of "Talk:Unofficial Tutorials"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Cipscis |
imported>Cipscis m (→Merge: Typo - extra "less than" character) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
I've suggested a merge with the [[Links]] page. If no one objects I'll merge the two before the end next week. (Feel free to do the same if I haven't by then.) | I've suggested a merge with the [[Links]] page. If no one objects I'll merge the two before the end next week. (Feel free to do the same if I haven't by then.) | ||
<br/>--[[User:Qazaaq|Qazaaq]] 21:44, 28 July 2009 (UTC) | <br/>--[[User:Qazaaq|Qazaaq]] 21:44, 28 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Looks like you forgot to do this. It might have been a bit longer than two weeks, but better late than never - I just merged the content on this page with [[Links]] | :Looks like you forgot to do this. It might have been a bit longer than two weeks, but better late than never - I just merged the content on this page with [[Links]]<br />-- [[User:Cipscis|Cipscis]] 01:53, 21 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:53, 20 January 2010
Ok...
Great idea. But also, this is blatant advertisement. I haven't read the tutorials, I don't know if they're any good, but this page needs to be more thorough. One of the biggest weaknesses of the CS Wiki is a failure to properly link to off-site tutorials. We're terrible at it. The GECK Wiki would be much improved if it did this better. This is a... well, it's a start, even if it is ridiculously one-sided. Could someone flesh this out, get some Nexus and such links in here?
DragoonWraith · talk · 04:05, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Merge
I've suggested a merge with the Links page. If no one objects I'll merge the two before the end next week. (Feel free to do the same if I haven't by then.)
--Qazaaq 21:44, 28 July 2009 (UTC)