Difference between revisions of "User talk:SnakeChomp/Formula Formatting test"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
User talk:SnakeChomp/Formula Formatting test (edit)
Revision as of 15:00, 13 January 2009
, 15:00, 13 January 2009Re: my last comment
imported>SnakeChomp m (→New Formatting: link to current page this test is based off of) |
imported>SnakeChomp (Re: my last comment) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
::Also, I don't mind if anyone else messes around with the testing page, so if you have ideas feel free to add them. It's just a test after all. =) | ::Also, I don't mind if anyone else messes around with the testing page, so if you have ideas feel free to add them. It's just a test after all. =) | ||
::--[[User:SnakeChomp|SnakeChomp]] 19:55, 13 January 2009 (UTC) | ::--[[User:SnakeChomp|SnakeChomp]] 19:55, 13 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::Actually, having the major components bolded and the minor components italicized doesn't seem so bad, since the bolded components refer to the minor components using italics anyway. Having the whitespace between the groups helps to distinguish them and break up the wall of text with a blank line at least. Perhaps the PerkModifiers bit should be moved into the 2nd group? It follows the "Foo is ..." convention (which the 2nd group uses) and not the "Foo = ..." convention (which the majority of the first group uses). | |||
:::--[[User:SnakeChomp|SnakeChomp]] 20:00, 13 January 2009 (UTC) | |||