Difference between revisions of "Talk:Settings"
Move old stuff into a separate section and new stuff to the top
imported>SnakeChomp (→Default values: Default values) |
imported>SnakeChomp (Move old stuff into a separate section and new stuff to the top) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= Active discussion = | |||
== Default values == | |||
I've just been directed to one of the various settings pages from a thread on the official GECK forum, and it looks like a few of the default values aren't correct. When I went to check the correct default values, I noticed that Fallout3.esm changes that values of many GMSTs.<br /><br />Should the default values listed here be the actual default values of the setting, or the values assigned to the setting when Fallout3.esm is loaded? The latter seems to be the case at the moment, but (at least to me) the former seems to make more sense, as Fallout3.esm is essentially just an official modder's resource.<br />-- [[User:Cipscis|Cipscis]] 00:24, 17 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Which page was it? Default values from Fallout3.esm should be used and not the ones in the base GECK with nothing loaded. | |||
:--[[User:SnakeChomp|SnakeChomp]] 01:12, 17 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
= Archived discussion = | |||
== Consolidation == | == Consolidation == | ||
I've consolidated some settings into setting group pages, redirecting when there were already individual pages. I highly recommend that we avoid individual pages for settings '''''wherever possible''''', as it creates clutter and makes information hard to correlate. <br> | I've consolidated some settings into setting group pages, redirecting when there were already individual pages. I highly recommend that we avoid individual pages for settings '''''wherever possible''''', as it creates clutter and makes information hard to correlate. <br> | ||
| Line 178: | Line 189: | ||
I think it's easier if the settings are categorized in a few (or more) groups. Most settings don't have a lot to do with others, putting them all on one page wouldn't be very helpful. I don't think we have to list all settings on the settings page even. Listing the group names should be sufficient. | I think it's easier if the settings are categorized in a few (or more) groups. Most settings don't have a lot to do with others, putting them all on one page wouldn't be very helpful. I don't think we have to list all settings on the settings page even. Listing the group names should be sufficient. | ||
<br/>--[[User:Qazaaq|Qazaaq]] 18:15, 29 December 2008 (UTC) | <br/>--[[User:Qazaaq|Qazaaq]] 18:15, 29 December 2008 (UTC) | ||