Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Function"
→More/Longer examples: if they're there, let them be: otherwise, short ones can show more use cases.
imported>DragoonWraith |
imported>DewiMorgan (→More/Longer examples: if they're there, let them be: otherwise, short ones can show more use cases.) |
||
| Line 178: | Line 178: | ||
::Just my 2¢. | ::Just my 2¢. | ||
::[[User:DragoonWraith|DragoonWraith]] · [[User talk:DragoonWraith|talk]] · 06:30, 26 April 2009 (UTC) | ::[[User:DragoonWraith|DragoonWraith]] · [[User talk:DragoonWraith|talk]] · 06:30, 26 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
::: In most language references, it's nicer to have a few brief examples showing the full range of possible use cases, than a single lengthy example showing the context in which it might be used. The one exception I can think of is open/read/close, which tend to be shown in an example together I'd argue for not to delete lengthy examples merely because of style: instead to reformat them into the correct style. | |||
::: However, if someone were to key in a longer example, I certainly wouldn't delete it as unfitting: if it were mammoth, I'd move it off to its own page, but I have strong reservations against deleting any useful user-created content: it's inefficient to waste the work, and it dissuades the editor from creating more pages, if they see swathes of work they spent a long time on being scorned and trashed rather than built on. There are few enough contributing editors as it is. [[User:DewiMorgan|DewiMorgan]] 13:08, 26 April 2009 (UTC) | |||