Template talk:Function

From the Fallout3 GECK Wiki
Revision as of 18:26, 12 December 2008 by imported>Qazaaq (returnVal and categoryList)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

General

Looks pretty nice Qazaaq. I've been working on some ideas and placed them on the other wiki's Syntax page. I've gotta' run so I'll look at this some more later.
--Haama 17:16, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

OK, got to look at it a bit more.
  • For the link to the CS wiki page, should we assume that it has the same name (if there is one)? That would be one less field to worry about.
  • We should add a statement about the origin before the syntax, as on the CS wiki.
--Haama 19:56, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
I've divided your answer into sections below with my response. This should be easier to follow.
--Qazaaq 23:16, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Discussion about individual fields

CS Wiki link

For the link to the CS wiki page, should we assume that it has the same name (if there is one)? That would be one less field to worry about.
--Haama 19:56, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

There has to be at least one field for CS Wiki link to determine if there has to be one or not. Whether this is a boolean of some sort or the name of the article doesn't matter. Using the article name will allow for more flexibility. When the field is omitted the entire notice is left out.
--Qazaaq 23:16, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Origin

We should add a statement about the origin before the syntax, as on the CS wiki.
--Haama 19:56, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

There's already a statement for the origin in there. It's just not showing in the example. It will display an error message if it's omitted, the current GECK should be specified with GECK1, FOSE function will probably have room for a version number and display a notice.
--Qazaaq 23:16, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

ReturnVal

Currently, if the return value is omitted this will show an error. If it's left empty it will show the empty braces () Haama suggested at the CS Wiki, if it's filled in it will obviously be filled in. I've chosen to fill in void in the example because I think that's clearer. Any thoughts?
--Qazaaq 23:26, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

CategoryList

We need something clever for to handle the categories. I'm open to suggestions.
--Qazaaq 23:26, 12 December 2008 (UTC)