Difference between revisions of "Talk:Function Page"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>SnakeChomp |
imported>DragoonWraith |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:I don't believe we have the necessary javascripting support enabled on this wiki to do something like this. I will be reorganizing the page later this evening now that all the functions are there with basic categorization; specifically changing the numbered lists into real sections using conventional wiki syntax. Breaking up the all black underlined style of the page will help with navigation and readability. | :I don't believe we have the necessary javascripting support enabled on this wiki to do something like this. I will be reorganizing the page later this evening now that all the functions are there with basic categorization; specifically changing the numbered lists into real sections using conventional wiki syntax. Breaking up the all black underlined style of the page will help with navigation and readability. | ||
:--[[User:SnakeChomp|SnakeChomp]] 17:58, 9 February 2009 (UTC) | :--[[User:SnakeChomp|SnakeChomp]] 17:58, 9 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
::Such things are possible on Wikipedia; I'll look into whether or not they're possible here. | |||
::[[User:DragoonWraith|DragoonWraith]] · [[User talk:DragoonWraith|talk]] · 18:57, 9 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:57, 9 February 2009
Collapsible Categories
Is there a way to make the function categories collapsible? I can't say I'd prefer it until it was tried, but it may make the page cleaner if it wasn't a huge list.
-TastyWheat (talk - contribs) 15:53, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- I don't believe we have the necessary javascripting support enabled on this wiki to do something like this. I will be reorganizing the page later this evening now that all the functions are there with basic categorization; specifically changing the numbered lists into real sections using conventional wiki syntax. Breaking up the all black underlined style of the page will help with navigation and readability.
- --SnakeChomp 17:58, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- Such things are possible on Wikipedia; I'll look into whether or not they're possible here.
- DragoonWraith · talk · 18:57, 9 February 2009 (UTC)