Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Function"
imported>Qazaaq (headers and response to Haama) |
imported>Qazaaq (returnVal and categoryList) |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
:There's already a statement for the origin in there. It's just not showing in the example. It will display an error message if it's omitted, the current GECK should be specified with GECK1, FOSE function will probably have room for a version number and display a notice. | :There's already a statement for the origin in there. It's just not showing in the example. It will display an error message if it's omitted, the current GECK should be specified with GECK1, FOSE function will probably have room for a version number and display a notice. | ||
:--[[User:Qazaaq|Qazaaq]] 23:16, 12 December 2008 (UTC) | :--[[User:Qazaaq|Qazaaq]] 23:16, 12 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
===ReturnVal=== | |||
Currently, if the return value is omitted this will show an error. If it's left empty it will show the empty braces () Haama suggested at the CS Wiki, if it's filled in it will obviously be filled in. I've chosen to fill in ''void'' in the example because I think that's clearer. Any thoughts? | |||
<br/>--[[User:Qazaaq|Qazaaq]] 23:26, 12 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
===CategoryList=== | |||
We need something clever for to handle the categories. I'm open to suggestions. | |||
<br/>--[[User:Qazaaq|Qazaaq]] 23:26, 12 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:26, 12 December 2008
General
Looks pretty nice Qazaaq. I've been working on some ideas and placed them on the other wiki's Syntax page. I've gotta' run so I'll look at this some more later.
--Haama 17:16, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- OK, got to look at it a bit more.
- For the link to the CS wiki page, should we assume that it has the same name (if there is one)? That would be one less field to worry about.
- We should add a statement about the origin before the syntax, as on the CS wiki.
- --Haama 19:56, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- I've divided your answer into sections below with my response. This should be easier to follow.
- --Qazaaq 23:16, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Discussion about individual fields
CS Wiki link
For the link to the CS wiki page, should we assume that it has the same name (if there is one)? That would be one less field to worry about.
--Haama 19:56, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- There has to be at least one field for CS Wiki link to determine if there has to be one or not. Whether this is a boolean of some sort or the name of the article doesn't matter. Using the article name will allow for more flexibility. When the field is omitted the entire notice is left out.
- --Qazaaq 23:16, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Origin
We should add a statement about the origin before the syntax, as on the CS wiki.
--Haama 19:56, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- There's already a statement for the origin in there. It's just not showing in the example. It will display an error message if it's omitted, the current GECK should be specified with GECK1, FOSE function will probably have room for a version number and display a notice.
- --Qazaaq 23:16, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
ReturnVal
Currently, if the return value is omitted this will show an error. If it's left empty it will show the empty braces () Haama suggested at the CS Wiki, if it's filled in it will obviously be filled in. I've chosen to fill in void in the example because I think that's clearer. Any thoughts?
--Qazaaq 23:26, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
CategoryList
We need something clever for to handle the categories. I'm open to suggestions.
--Qazaaq 23:26, 12 December 2008 (UTC)